California Legal Brief

AI-Generated Practitioner Briefs of California Appellate Opinions

state of mind exception

1 opinion tagged “state of mind exception”

P. v. Tzul 3/23/26 CA2/7

The Rule of People v. Tzul is that a defendant's handwritten note found at a crime scene stating he found victims "having sex" and that this "fills me with rage" is admissible as circumstantial evidence of the defendant's state of mind for provocation defense, under circumstances where the statement about what defendant observed is not hearsay when offered to show defendant's belief rather than truth of the observation, and the statement about defendant's emotional reaction is admissible hearsay under Evidence Code section 1250's state-of-mind exception.